Radeon x1600 vs. GF9400 in MBPs So, which one?
#1
Posted 25 June 2009 - 02:41 AM
So, can anyone tell me which of the two cards mentioned is the best?
#2
Posted 25 June 2009 - 03:30 AM
By the way, I am sure you could pick up a refurb'd 9400 model for a good price.
Liberator.
iMac C2D: 2.16GHz l 2GB RAM l OSX 10.4.11 l nVidia 7600GT l 256 MB VRAM
He who knows he has enough is rich.
A really great game made by Eric5h5
#4
Posted 25 June 2009 - 05:23 AM
#5
Posted 25 June 2009 - 05:52 AM
To which you obviously say "uh, kicks but what?"
Macbook Pro - C2D 2.4Ghz / 4Gb RAM / WD Scorpio Black 320GB ( 255GB OSX v 42GB XP ) / Geforce 8600M GT 256Mb / 15.4"
Cube - G4 1.7Ghz 7448 / 1.5Gb RAM / Samsung Spinpoint 250GB / Geforce 6200 256Mb
We won! Apple offer the 17" with a matte screen! Well... at a price...
#7
Posted 25 June 2009 - 08:50 AM
Which model are you going to go for? plastic or alu?
Macbook Pro - C2D 2.4Ghz / 4Gb RAM / WD Scorpio Black 320GB ( 255GB OSX v 42GB XP ) / Geforce 8600M GT 256Mb / 15.4"
Cube - G4 1.7Ghz 7448 / 1.5Gb RAM / Samsung Spinpoint 250GB / Geforce 6200 256Mb
We won! Apple offer the 17" with a matte screen! Well... at a price...
#8
Posted 25 June 2009 - 08:55 AM
teflon, on June 25th 2009, 04:50 PM, said:
Which model are you going to go for? plastic or alu?
Yeah, OpenCL and especially the video decoding part is also something I'm really happy about!
And definately the Pro model..
#9
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:41 PM
As others have said the X1600 and 9400M are pretty close in performance. The 9400M would pull away in shader heavy games while the X1600 would probably have the advantage at higher resolutions due to dedicated memory. Overall, a modern 13.3" MacBook would be faster due to advances in the CPU and memory. Being newer, the 9400M would probably also be more likely to receive driver optimization effort for newer games working to it's advantage, while the X1600 drivers will probably stagnate moving forward, especially now that ATI has transitioned the X1600 to legacy driver support on Windows.
#10
#12
Posted 29 June 2009 - 09:27 AM
The Liberator, on June 26th 2009, 06:22 PM, said:
Yes it would, if I had the money.
So, how does the GF9400 fare in Mac games? I can't seem to find any threads on it...
#13
Posted 29 June 2009 - 07:51 PM
Liberator.
iMac C2D: 2.16GHz l 2GB RAM l OSX 10.4.11 l nVidia 7600GT l 256 MB VRAM
He who knows he has enough is rich.
A really great game made by Eric5h5
#14
Posted 30 June 2009 - 06:56 AM
The Liberator, on June 30th 2009, 03:51 AM, said:
Liberator.
Doh. Doh.
Well, that convinced me enough that going to a GF9400 won't affect my current gaming situation, except for the smaller screen. Nice!
#15
Posted 30 June 2009 - 07:28 AM
Liberator.
iMac C2D: 2.16GHz l 2GB RAM l OSX 10.4.11 l nVidia 7600GT l 256 MB VRAM
He who knows he has enough is rich.
A really great game made by Eric5h5
#17
Posted 30 June 2009 - 08:05 AM
Liberator.
iMac C2D: 2.16GHz l 2GB RAM l OSX 10.4.11 l nVidia 7600GT l 256 MB VRAM
He who knows he has enough is rich.
A really great game made by Eric5h5

Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote


