Eric5h5, on June 11th 2009, 11:26 AM, said:
It didn't have a 32-bit address bus. There was software written for it that failed on 100% 32-bit chips because of that.
Every time somebody calls 68k machines with 16-bit busses 16-bit, it chisels away at my remaining faith in humanity. I mean, when my Classic (powered by the exact same 68000 as the original 128k Mac) used 32-bit addressing, I guess it must've been infested with magical pink pixies or something.
…I miss those pixies…
If that were actually true, then every Powermac from the original 601 models was
really a 64-bit computer, wow! Even dumber than the bit-depth one is when
peoplecomplete idiots say that old 68k Macs with a 2:1 FSB ratio had “clock-doubled CPUs,” so my 660/av didn't “actually” have a 50MHz CPU, but a 25MHz one. By the same token, I suppose the current 2.8GHz MBP “really” has a 1GHz CPU. Right.
Still, the good part is that nobody is stupid enough to say dumb nonsense like that about contemporary computers nowadays.
Eric,