Feral ports Tomb Raider Anniversary
#1
Posted 23 November 2007 - 02:18 PM
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"
#2
Posted 23 November 2007 - 02:53 PM
Prince of Persia games?
Wish Aspyr would come out with a good title soon. I don't see anything of interest to me on their "coming soon'
page at the moment...Feral seems to be getting all of my money now.
#3
Posted 23 November 2007 - 03:20 PM
#4
Posted 23 November 2007 - 03:23 PM
placy, on November 23rd 2007, 08:53 PM, said:
Prince of Persia games?
Excellent news! It isn't clear if it is Intel only or Universal. One page of the mini site (system requirements) say Intel Only but the pre-order page says "a universal version will be available". I'm hoping it is universal so I can hang on to my G5 a little longer (Feral have been really good with recent games in this regard) but if not I'll buy it and keep it until I next upgrade! I really need an Intel Mac that can run my PowerPC games as fast in Rosetta as they are native and I don't think we are there yet.
#5
Posted 24 November 2007 - 08:32 AM
Rev-O, on November 23rd 2007, 10:20 PM, said:
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"
#6
Posted 25 November 2007 - 04:34 AM
#7
Posted 25 November 2007 - 08:07 AM
iRolley, on November 25th 2007, 11:34 AM, said:
By the way: I don't know if anyone has already checked the pre-order option, but you can find there this little gem:
Quote
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"
#9
Posted 25 November 2007 - 11:51 AM
Eric5h5, on November 25th 2007, 06:12 PM, said:
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"
#10
Posted 25 November 2007 - 12:02 PM
--Eric
#12
Posted 26 November 2007 - 04:37 AM
The game will run on all Intel machines apart from machines with Intel Integrated cards (New and Old MacBook).
The PPC min spec it yet to be set but I would expect the min to be in the 2.0 Ghz to 1.6 Ghz range but we will know more
once we get closer to the PPC release.
The game does not use the same engine as the prince of persia games and it is a custom graphic engine, an earlier version of the graphics engine was used to make Tomb Raider Legend.
Anniversary is the original game re-imagined and with all the improvements you get in 10 years of games development like high quality graphics, not running in square shaped patterns, etc.... (If you played the original you will know what I mean.
Anyway more info as it becomes available.
Edwin
#13
Posted 26 November 2007 - 11:03 AM
edddeduck, on November 26th 2007, 04:37 AM, said:
Heh. It takes a $1200+ Mac with 'Pro' specs* to play games. Heck of a job.
*The only 'capable' non-Pro Mac is an iMac that pretty much matches a MacBook Pro.
#14
Posted 26 November 2007 - 11:29 AM
bobbob, on November 26th 2007, 10:03 AM, said:
Heh. It takes a $1200+ Mac with 'Pro' specs* to play games. Heck of a job.
*The only 'capable' non-Pro Mac is an iMac that pretty much matches a MacBook Pro.
To recap, Tomb Raider runs on all Intel iMacs, MacBookPros and MacPros. The MacBook and Mini are only discounted due to the fact the graphics hardware is missing items that are important to gaming like hardware supported shaders, dedicated RAM etc..
If you want to play new games you need a graphics card that actually has hardware vertex & pixel shaders. This technology exists on most PPC/Intel Mac machines made in the last few years (for example the original PPC mini powered by the 9200 card has more graphics power than the original Intel Mini with the GMA 950). However the Intel integrated cards in the Mini and MacBook do not have any hardware support and all of the T&L graphics are done on the CPU which is much slower (this is what used to happen in the days of Doom 2 and Duke Nukem before hardware graphics started to happen).
Sadly this means that trying to get any games to run on the card is a tricky (but sometimes possible) business and hence we usually only support Mac's with standalone dedicated graphics cards for new releases.
We do have a collection of our older games being UA patched to provide games for the MacBook / Mini market as we know most of our new games will not work on these popular but underpowered (for modern gaming) machines. The Feral back catalogue is getting UA patches allowing for native game play along with some more performance and maybe the odd new feature. These games are older and hence will allow us to get the performance required even though the graphics card is not designed towards 3D gaming.
Hope everyone enjoys Tomb Raider when it comes out, as we are doing our best to allow as many Mac users to play the game by still supporting PPC owners with a UA version of the game scheduled.
Edwin
#15
Posted 26 November 2007 - 12:43 PM
edddeduck, on November 26th 2007, 05:29 PM, said:
Edwin
This is excellent news! There is life in my Power Mac G5 yet! I really appreciate this.
edddeduck, on November 26th 2007, 05:29 PM, said:
Even better! I might be tempted to get a Mac Pro when they are next updated. It is just my games (and wallet) that are holding me back now. I don't have space for my G5 as well and I don't want to be without an F1 game. F1 CS2000 runs nicely on my G5 2.5GHz Dual with X800XT and I doubt we are yet at a point where Rosetta can run my PowerPC games faster?
#16
Posted 26 November 2007 - 02:01 PM
edddeduck, on November 26th 2007, 10:29 AM, said:
What about the X3100 on the latest MacBooks? Doesn't that support hardware T&L?
#18
Posted 26 November 2007 - 02:59 PM
rampancy, on November 26th 2007, 08:01 PM, said:
yes it does, but it still sucks and isnt really much faster than previous offerings, making it nearly as difficult to get the game playable on it as it was before.
Macbook Pro - C2D 2.4Ghz / 4GB RAM / Samsung 830 256GB SSD / Geforce 8600M GT 256Mb / 15.4"
Cube - G4 1.7Ghz 7448 / 1.5GB RAM / Samsung Spinpoint 250GB / Geforce 6200 256Mb
Self-built PC - C2Q Q8300 2.5Ghz / 4GB RAM / Samsung 830 256GB SSD / Radeon 7850 OC 1GB / W7 x64
and a beautiful HP LP2475w 24" H-IPS monitor
#19
Posted 27 November 2007 - 03:06 AM
teflon, on November 26th 2007, 08:59 PM, said:
I'd definitely buy it so count me in! Even if it is Intel only and I have to keep it until I get an Intel Mac.
#20
Posted 27 November 2007 - 03:16 AM
//Rob

















