Jump to content


VMWare Vs Parallels


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 IMG News

IMG News

    Pimpbot 4000

  • IMG Writers
  • 8622 posts
  • Pro Member:Yes

Posted 27 August 2007 - 07:14 AM

Macworld UK has posted a new feature examining the virtualization software provided by VMWare and Parallels. The article examines the strengths and weaknesses of the competing products, and offers some insights from VMWare's Richard Garsthagen and Parallels' Benjamin Rudolph.

Discussing the differences between VMWare and its rivals, VMWare’s Product Marketing Manager, Enterprise Desktop, Richard Garsthagen told Macworld: “All Apple computers have more than one core, some might even have multiple processors. Parallels can only leverage one singe core, one single processor. With our solution you can give more power to the more CPU intensive applications, such as Photoshop.”

Parallels’ Benjamin Rudolph is not concerned by his product’s limitations in these areas, however. “VMWare does offer Symmetric Multiprocessing (SMP) support and x64 support, but these are features that the average user a) doesn't understand and b) doesn't need. Only very high-end, power users need or want these features. That being said, we are adding them in the next several months. We've been publicly announcing that these are coming for many months now.”

On the flip side, however, Parallels Desktop is the only virtualization product that supports 3D gaming right now. Parallels is “the only solution that can run OpenGL applications like Quake4,” said Rudolph.

Garsthagen said: “Most of the PC games, especially the older PC games, work fine.” But he did admit that there is some way to go before the consumer gets a “true PC experience” in this area.
To read the rest of the article follow the link provided below.
Return to Full Article - InsideMacGames News


#2 Janichsan

Janichsan

    Jugger Bugger

  • Forum Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8256 posts
  • Steam Name:Janichsan
  • Location:over there

Posted 27 August 2007 - 07:20 AM

View PostIMG News, on August 27th 2007, 03:14 PM, said:

On the flip side, however, Parallels Desktop is the only virtualization product that supports 3D gaming right now. Parallels is “the only solution that can run OpenGL applications like Quake4,” said Rudolph.
Er, yeah, sure... Parallels is the only virtualisation product with 3D support - apart from CrossOver and VMware... :huh:

"We do what we must, because we can."
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"


#3 Dark_Archon

Dark_Archon

    Master Blaster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1792 posts
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 27 August 2007 - 07:51 AM

Hasn't VMWare had DX8 support longer than Parallels?
Mac Pro 2.66 Ghz NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 7 GB RAM SONY DW-D150A SuperDrive

#4 Hansi

Hansi

    Master Blaster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1785 posts
  • Steam ID:hansroberth
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 27 August 2007 - 07:56 AM

Yes it has.

#5 Lowry

Lowry

    Fan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 32 posts
  • Location:Adelaide Australia

Posted 27 August 2007 - 09:02 PM

Not much about OpenGL apps on Windows or Linux.
Just bits of PR.

#6 Eric5h5

Eric5h5

    Minion Tormentor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7160 posts

Posted 27 August 2007 - 09:38 PM

View PostIMG News, on August 27th 2007, 09:14 AM, said:

Parallels’ Benjamin Rudolph is not concerned by his product’s limitations in these areas, however. “VMWare does offer Symmetric Multiprocessing (SMP) support and x64 support, but these are features that the average user a) doesn't understand and b) doesn't need. Only very high-end, power users need or want these features. That being said, we are adding them in the next several months. We've been publicly announcing that these are coming for many months now.”

I ran this through my MarketSpeakTranslat-O-Matic 3000, and got this output: "Any features that the competition has, and we don't, suck and nobody needs them.  But we're putting them in because they're actually features that people want despite what I just said, and when we're done, they will become awesome features that everybody needs."  Hmm....

--Eric