Jump to content


Designing For Motivation


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 IMG News

IMG News

    Pimpbot 4000

  • IMG Writers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7117 posts
  • Pro Member:Yes

Posted 12 June 2007 - 07:01 AM

Gamasutra recently posted an interesting article on motivational game design. The piece offers an in-depth examination of the motivations which drive gamers to keep playing and the tools which developers can use to tap into those motivations. Games such as Diablo and StarCraft serve as examples of different types of design.

The “reward system” is the fundamental base for all motivation management. The rule is that every player’s effort must be rewarded. Even though the reward could take many forms, its role is mainly to motivate.

In action-RPG titles such as Diablo or Guild Wars, the gameplay is built on the growth of the character's strength. This is carried out by a system of experience and levels associated with a system of equipment. To reach the next level the player has to cumulate enough points of experience. By passing through a succession of challenges, he will obtain this experience as well as the equipment needed for the next challenge.

Even though this system looks ideal and scalable, it has its weaknesses. When the limit of progression is reached, the game looses its interest and the motivation disappears. If there is no limit, the system does not offer any objectives or references and thus the motivation is very weak.

In the case of Diablo, the randomness of categories and reward characteristics increases the motivation of players to replay in order to achieve the perfect item. The disadvantage is that the player has no real reference of the ratio challenge / reward since one “unique” item can be the reward for next to no challenge.
The full article is available from the link below.
Return to Full Article - InsideMacGames News


#2 Tesseract

Tesseract

    Uberspewer

  • Forum Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3425 posts
  • Pro Member:Yes

Posted 13 June 2007 - 03:11 AM

Diablo II "motivated" me to stop playing once I got a character to Act IV of Nightmare, long before the limit of progression was reached. By that point it took forever to get enough XP for the next level and the associated reward of allocating stats & skills, and you basically had to go on repeated boss runs just to get equipment that was good enough to move forward with.

#3 Mister Mumbles

Mister Mumbles

    Uberspewer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2510 posts
  • Steam Name:Mister Mumbles
  • Location:Not here; not there; not anywhere!

Posted 13 June 2007 - 10:41 AM

I tried to run through the game long after I've beaten it. I might have gotten half-way through; then I got bored and stopped. Hack'n'slash games are just too tedious.
Formerly known as a Mac gamer.

#4 Janichsan

Janichsan

    Venting Toot Pipe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6530 posts
  • Steam Name:Janichsan
  • Location:over there

Posted 13 June 2007 - 11:54 AM

View PostPegasus, on June 13th 2007, 06:41 PM, said:

I tried to run through the game long after I've beaten it. I might have gotten half-way through; then I got bored and stopped. Hack'n'slash games are just too tedious.
Yup. I could hardly bring myself to replay the game in a higher difficulty setting. It's still a mystery to me how some people (like one of my former flat share mates) managed to stay motivated enough to bring five or six characters to level 99...
"We do what we must, because we can."
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"

#5 morback

morback

    Fanatic

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Location:Istanbul

Posted 13 June 2007 - 03:50 PM

It helps to play online with real friends and be connected to teamspeak.