Jump to content


Overclocking the MacBook's X1600 in WinXP


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 IMG News

IMG News

    Pimpbot 4000

  • IMG Writers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7117 posts
  • Pro Member:Yes

Posted 20 April 2006 - 10:10 AM

For those that haven't yet heard the news, various owners of the MacBook Pro that have been tinkering with Boot Camp have successfully been overclocking their ATI X1600s by using ATITool in WinXP. Word is that Apple's current driver keeps the X1600 underclocked compared to similar PC setups, and folks have since then been using ATITool to boost performance in graphics applications.

Accelerate Your Mac has started a running thread of reader reports regarding the overclocking. Initial reports vary, with one user reporting instability issues when clocking past a certain spec.

Acutally it is a quite strange overclocking experience to me , because on most desktop graphics cards, it may get glitch on the screen if you push the card too much before the system crashes. However on my MBP's X1600, it will run perfectly without any glitch at 460 / 360, but when I set it to 470 / 370, the system became very unstable and crashes.
As always, those interested in overclocking are cautioned against the usual issues, including overheating and increased power usage. On the Mac side of things, AYM has sent an inquiry to the maker of ATICellerator II to see if an update is forthcoming for the X1600.
Return to Full Article - InsideMacGames News


#2 nagromme

nagromme

    Master Blaster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1941 posts

Posted 20 April 2006 - 10:32 AM

A nice project, but no thanks, I think I'd rather live vicariously through other people's experiments! I'm thinking Apple reduced the heat in the MacBook Pro for a good reason. And when I saw my uncle's brand new Dell laptop that was as thick and heavy as a tank, I can guess why. Truly TOP performance is not a goal to be met at the same time as portability.

#3 griel

griel

    Legendary

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 539 posts
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 20 April 2006 - 10:59 AM

I figure they reduce the clock speed on this version of the 'book so that they can bump it back up on the next version and call it an X1600 pro or something.

#4 hambone

hambone

    Legendary

  • IMG Writers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 890 posts
  • Location:Toronto -- Land of the rising snow

Posted 20 April 2006 - 12:42 PM

tinkering with a replaceable card in a tower is one thing, but risking your entire laptop mobo for a few extra FPS is not worth it.

#5 the Battle Cat

the Battle Cat

    Sewage Served Raw

  • Admin
  • 14875 posts
  • Location:Citadel City, Lh'owon
  • Pro Member:Yes

Posted 20 April 2006 - 01:35 PM

::singing:: Chestnuts roasting on an open fire...
Gary Simmons
the Battle Cat

#6 converted2truth

converted2truth

    Notorious

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Location:Mountain West

Posted 20 April 2006 - 02:37 PM

My question is if this is a similar situation to when apple released the 9800pro OEM G5 (release machine).  They purposefully underclocked the card because the chips were defective at retail clock speeds.  It was how apple got a price cut on the card.

Are they doing this to the MBP because of heat problems? or because it's a reject incapable of retail speeds and they just wanted to save a few bucks...
Mac Pro/2.66/2GB RAM/X1900/1.5TB & 250GB X partition/250GB XP partition/Dell 24" LCD
MBP CD2.0/2GB ram/100GB HD (20GB XP partition)/ATI X1600m

#7 bobbob

bobbob

    Uberspewer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3318 posts

Posted 20 April 2006 - 02:55 PM

View Postconverted2truth, on April 20th 2006, 01:37 PM, said:

Are they doing this to the MBP because of heat problems? or because it's a reject incapable of retail speeds and they just wanted to save a few bucks...

If they have heat/battery problems, then there's no use paying more for a higher speed bin if you can't use it.

#8 Abecedaria

Abecedaria

    Heroic

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 462 posts
  • Location:Ceti-alpha 5

Posted 20 April 2006 - 06:39 PM

View Postbobbob, on April 20th 2006, 01:55 PM, said:

If they have heat/battery problems, then there's no use paying more for a higher speed bin if you can't use it.

You would think that overclocking a PC was some new revelation. Big deal. When running Windows XP, the MacBook Pro is just another WinTel laptop, but with a really fancy case.

Of course, there's that thing about being able to boot the Mac OS that's pretty cool, too.


abc
"THIS is Ceti-alpha 5!"
| 17" MacBook Pro | Core 2 Duo 2.33Ghz | 2GB RAM | Radeon Mobility x1600 256MB |
| Boot Camp Windows XP Config: ATI Driver - DHzer0point Catalyst 0.69 | Current overclock: 475 - 475 (stock) |