Opinions Sought On IntelliTXT Ads on IMG
Posted 18 February 2006 - 04:06 PM
This post is meant as a bit of a warning and to also get some opinions on a new form of advertising that we will likely be implementing come next week on IMG and MGF. Although this form of advertising has been around for a while, a company called Vibrant Media has had a lot of success recently with their IntelliTXT ads. They've been able to sign up sites such as IGN, Warcry, and more and more are coming online (I believe MacNN is experimenting with them).
So, what is IntelliTXT? Well, the best way to show you is to see if for yourself. Head over to this page any you'll see the ads yourself. On this page, you'll notice that some of the words in the article are double underlined in green. These are the ads.
So when Vibrant approached us I thought long and hard about it and have decided that we would try it (on a trial basis). Frankly, the CPM rates that they give are astronomical compared to current third party ads we use such as Google, Tribal Fusion, etc. However, I've decided that if we do implement IntelliTXT, we will be doing a few things to counterbalance the addition of these ads. Such as:
- Most 3rd party ads that you see on IMG and MGF will disappear. Crappy flashy ads that advertise smiley faces and such will be gone for good.
- All pop up ads will disappear for good.
- Google ads would probably disappear for good. In general, there will be less ads on IMG and MGF.
And finally, you, the reader, will have the option to turn these IntelliTXT ads off on IMG and MGF (provided you have cookies turned on in your browser) as soon as they become active. Once you turn them off, they will never come back (unless you delete your cookies from your browser).
I would like to hear some well thought out opinions on the subject. These IntelliTXT ads are not without controversy but they are highly effective and they pay out very well. I'm a firm believer that Internet advertising has to evolve and in order to stay in business, companies such as ourselves need to adopt new forms of advertising in order to grow.
Before you embark on a rant or opinion, please keep in mind that you will have the option to turn these ads off. Let me know what you think.
Posted 18 February 2006 - 04:12 PM
I much prefer the Mac games publishers' and developers' ads, or just Mac publishers' and developers' ads in general, but that's just because they're not random.
Posted 18 February 2006 - 04:23 PM
Posted 18 February 2006 - 10:30 PM
And for the love of light, do not put it in the forums. The regular site I can put up with, I suppose, but the forum would just be torture.
I'm going to the vet to get tutored.
Posted 18 February 2006 - 11:17 PM
Looks like you won't have to put up with them anyway.
Posted 18 February 2006 - 11:19 PM
I find IntelliTXT far more disturbing on a forum than in site content. People who are not familiar with IntelliTXT could become confused when they see what appears to be other posters inserting random ads in their own posts.
I understand the fact that we can turn them off. From a simply hypothetical standpoint, if that was not an option I would turn all the ads on under IMG Pro just to avoid IntelliTXT.
Posted 19 February 2006 - 07:46 PM
if I didn't read this forum I would've fallen for the "link to more info" trick sooner or later and I wouldn't be charmed by it. actually I have a clear dislike for marketing tricks like this and I would strongly vote against it.
It's not askin the consumer if he/she might be interested in a product it's tricking the consumer into confrontation with the product wich -from a marketing point of view- is more effective.
another example of this trickery is the beep of the fryin pans at macdonalds. the beeps are loud enough to annoy you but aren't so loud that you it would keep you from going there again. as a result people tend to not stick around at macdonalds to have a nice chat after your meal but usually leave right after finishing wich means more people can come in and have a meal -> more profit.
it's nothing illegal or immoral even but it just makes me feel like an animal wich I really am apart from the fact that I can think! Long live the human brain! down with intelligence insulting marketing!
hope this helps
Posted 20 February 2006 - 12:44 PM
One of the advantages that IMG has over other sites is that we rarely direct link stuff in news stories, reviews, etc. Instead, our related links have always been put at the bottom of the ad, so there will be no confusion (for the most part). I checked out MacNN the other day and noticed that they have normal links with IntelliTXT ads mixed in and it looks pretty bad.
Second...disabling this ad. If you mouse over one of the ads and click on "what's this" you'll be taken to a page that explains these types of ads. At the bottom of the page, there is a link to disable this type of add. Please test it out.
Posted 20 February 2006 - 02:40 PM
I didn't want to try disabling the IntelliTXT ads at this point so as to continue testing without deleting my cookies.
the Battle Cat
Posted 20 February 2006 - 04:14 PM
Posted 20 February 2006 - 04:29 PM
But I also realize that running a website is an expensive proposition so money is needed. But I'm curious about how much traffic you get a month (in GB) to require advertising. (Just curious as I can pump 200GB of traffic monthly on my ISP for $10/month without extra fee.)
I'll probably whine, but get used to it.
Raven 27" i3 iMac 3.2GHz | 12GB RAM | 1TB HD | 512MB 5670 ATI Radeon HD
Crow iPad 2 | 32GB WiFi
"Not my circus, not my monkeys." -- Polish folk saying
"In ancient times cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this." -- Terry Pratchett
"I love cats because I enjoy my home; and little by little, they become its visible soul." -- Jean Cocteau
Posted 20 February 2006 - 05:10 PM
Posted 20 February 2006 - 06:37 PM
Anyways, I concur with what most are saying. On the regular site it'd probably be tolerable, but in forums/blogs it'd be a mess we wouldn't need.
Posted 20 February 2006 - 06:43 PM
Both? I'm guessing MGF does most of that. How much does IMG do, and how much of that isn't videos?
Posted 20 February 2006 - 09:14 PM
I could see the links on the test page and I'm pretty sure I was logged in proper. The links were only single underlined till I moused over them though.
In general I'm not a big fan of these type of ad links as I have a tendency to read with my cursor. Seeing as how we should be able to disable them though, I wouldn't think it would be an issue.
Posted 21 February 2006 - 12:01 AM
Posted 21 February 2006 - 11:14 AM
Mac OSX 10.4.5
"Home computers are being called upon to perform many new functions, including the consumption of homework formerly eaten by the dog." -Doug Larson