Jump to content


Apple Plans to Announce Move to Its Own Chips at WWDC

T2 ARM CPU BORG WALLED GARDEN LOUIS ROSSMANN ANTI-RIGHT-TO-REPAIR

  • Please log in to reply
106 replies to this topic

#101 Janichsan

Janichsan

    Jugger Bugger

  • Forum Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8576 posts
  • Steam Name:Janichsan
  • Location:over there

Posted 28 June 2020 - 04:01 AM

View PostThain Esh Kelch, on 28 June 2020 - 03:36 AM, said:

In other news, it appears that Apple might be ditching Intel, but extending their relationship with AMD. Big Sur apparently has references to not only RDNA2 and RNDA3 AMD GPUs, but also low end AMD CPUs and high-end server CPUs.

So. Many. Puzzle. Pieces!
Don't forget that Apple still will release Intel based Macs in the next year. Of course they still need AMD GPUs in these. That's no indication that the upcoming Arm Macs will have AMD GPUs as well.

"We do what we must, because we can."
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"


#102 Thain Esh Kelch

Thain Esh Kelch

    Admin

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4351 posts
  • Steam ID:thaineshkelch
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 29 June 2020 - 12:19 AM

View PostJanichsan, on 28 June 2020 - 04:01 AM, said:

Don't forget that Apple still will release Intel based Macs in the next year. Of course they still need AMD GPUs in these. That's no indication that the upcoming Arm Macs will have AMD GPUs as well.
Oh yeah, but that really only explain the RDNA2 mentions, and not everything else!

It could of course only mean that Apple is testing its options, but I really would have expected them to have done that way before Big Sur. Could it mean that they are ditching Intel, going ARM at the low end, but switching high end machines to AMD? One could hope!
"They're everywhere!" -BOB

#103 UmarOMC1

UmarOMC1

    Master Blaster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1665 posts
  • Location:NYC

Posted 29 June 2020 - 02:27 AM

Linus gives a fairly well-informed (IMHO) 2 cents

macOS 10.15.x/3.5GHZ 8-Core Xeon W-3223 2019 MacPro/48GB RAM/PowerColor RedDevil 5700XT

macOS 10.15.x/Manjario KDE/3.7GHz i7-8700K Hackintosh/64GB RAM/Gigabyte RADEON VII
(my 'world of hurt' that my kids built in a day & is easier to maintain than Windows)

macOS 10.14.x/3.33GHz Xeon W3580 cMacPro (5,1 flash)/64GB RAM/PowerColor RedDevil RX580

#104 Frost

Frost

    Secretary of Offense

  • Forum Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6212 posts
  • Steam ID:CaptFrost
  • Location:Republic of Texas
  • Pro Member:Yes

Posted 29 June 2020 - 07:11 PM

View PostUmarOMC1, on 29 June 2020 - 02:27 AM, said:

Linus gives a fairly well-informed (IMHO) 2 cents


Sometimes I want to smack Linus. This isn't one of them, great video with an even-handed realistic take.
Kestrel (Falcon NW Tiki) – 3.6 GHz i7 9900K / 32GB RAM / 2x2TB Intel 7600p (RAID0), 2x480GB Intel 730 (RAID0), 10TB STX BarraCuda Pro / TITAN V 12GB
Iridium (MacBook Pro Mid-2012) – 2.7 GHz i7 3820QM / 16GB RAM / 4TB Samsung 860 Pro / GeForce GT 650M 1GB

Eric5h5:
When there's a multiplayer version, I'm going to be on Frost's team. Well, except he doesn't seem to actually need a team...I mean, what's the point? "Hey look, it's Frost and His Merry Gang of Useless Hangers-On!" Or something.

#105 Sneaky Snake

Sneaky Snake

    Official Mascot of the 1988 Winter Olympics

  • IMG Writers
  • 3422 posts
  • Steam Name:SneakySnake
  • Steam ID:sneaky_snake
  • Location:Waterloo, Canada

Posted 29 June 2020 - 07:32 PM

Looks like someone broke NDA and there is benchmarks out of the A12Z running Geekbench (via Rosetta 2) in macOS 11.

https://www.macrumor...h&utm_campaign=

Note:
  • The Geekbench runs are done using Rosetta 2, since Geekbench in macOS is not available natively for ARM
  • The A12Z, running emulated Geekbench, outperforms the Surface Pro X, which was running a native version of Geekbench (no emulation)
  • Rosetta 2 seems to be around a 30% performance hit vs native (If you compare the macOS A12Z score with the iPad A12Z score)
  • The A12Z chip is almost certainly slower then anything that will actually be in a 'real' Mac that ships this fall (will probably have an A13X or A14X)

2019 16" MBP: i7 9750H @ 2.6 GHz || Radeon 5500M 4GB || 16 GB DDR4 || 512 GB SSD || macOS Catalina
Desktop PC: R5 3600X || GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 || 16 GB DDR4 || 960 Evo NVMe + 1TB Seagate FireCuda || Win10 Pro
Other: 30TB Plex Server || PS4 Pro || iPhone X

#106 Thain Esh Kelch

Thain Esh Kelch

    Admin

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4351 posts
  • Steam ID:thaineshkelch
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 30 June 2020 - 12:53 AM

Snatched from an Ars Technica discussion on the subject:

Quote

In an interview with John Gruber, Craig Federighi said this is meant as a devkit only and will not be replicated for the actual ARM based Macs and they'll run custom silicon. He also said something along the lines of "its not bad performance for a dev kit" and, quote, "This is without our silicon team even trying".

Can these scores have been run using Geekbench from iOS on Big Sur, and thus with native ARM support?
"They're everywhere!" -BOB

#107 jeannot

jeannot

    Heroic

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 421 posts

Posted 30 June 2020 - 04:20 AM

Quote

  • The Geekbench runs are done using Rosetta 2, since Geekbench in macOS is not available natively for ARM
But the iOS version is, and should be able to run natively on the dev kit.
EDIT: ok, it cannot yet be installed because it is only available on the iOS App Store.