Jump to content


Apple Plans to Announce Move to Its Own Chips at WWDC

T2 ARM CPU BORG WALLED GARDEN LOUIS ROSSMANN ANTI-RIGHT-TO-REPAIR

  • Please log in to reply
115 replies to this topic

#101 Janichsan

Janichsan

    Jugger Bugger

  • Forum Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8604 posts
  • Steam Name:Janichsan
  • Location:over there

Posted 28 June 2020 - 04:01 AM

View PostThain Esh Kelch, on 28 June 2020 - 03:36 AM, said:

In other news, it appears that Apple might be ditching Intel, but extending their relationship with AMD. Big Sur apparently has references to not only RDNA2 and RNDA3 AMD GPUs, but also low end AMD CPUs and high-end server CPUs.

So. Many. Puzzle. Pieces!
Don't forget that Apple still will release Intel based Macs in the next year. Of course they still need AMD GPUs in these. That's no indication that the upcoming Arm Macs will have AMD GPUs as well.

"We do what we must, because we can."
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"


#102 Thain Esh Kelch

Thain Esh Kelch

    Admin

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4395 posts
  • Steam ID:thaineshkelch
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 29 June 2020 - 12:19 AM

View PostJanichsan, on 28 June 2020 - 04:01 AM, said:

Don't forget that Apple still will release Intel based Macs in the next year. Of course they still need AMD GPUs in these. That's no indication that the upcoming Arm Macs will have AMD GPUs as well.
Oh yeah, but that really only explain the RDNA2 mentions, and not everything else!

It could of course only mean that Apple is testing its options, but I really would have expected them to have done that way before Big Sur. Could it mean that they are ditching Intel, going ARM at the low end, but switching high end machines to AMD? One could hope!
"They're everywhere!" -BOB

#103 UmarOMC1

UmarOMC1

    Gaming way too long

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1680 posts
  • Location:NYC

Posted 29 June 2020 - 02:27 AM

Linus gives a fairly well-informed (IMHO) 2 cents

macOS 10.15.x/3.5GHZ 8-Core Xeon W-3223 2019 MacPro/48GB RAM/PowerColor RedDevil 5700XT

macOS 10.15.x/Manjario KDE/3.7GHz i7-8700K Hackintosh/64GB RAM/Gigabyte RADEON VII
(my 'world of hurt' that my kids built in a day & is easier to maintain than Windows)

macOS 10.14.x/3.33GHz Xeon W3580 cMacPro (5,1 flash)/64GB RAM/PowerColor RedDevil RX580

#104 Frost

Frost

    Secretary of Offense

  • Forum Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6213 posts
  • Steam ID:CaptFrost
  • Location:Republic of Texas
  • Pro Member:Yes

Posted 29 June 2020 - 07:11 PM

View PostUmarOMC1, on 29 June 2020 - 02:27 AM, said:

Linus gives a fairly well-informed (IMHO) 2 cents


Sometimes I want to smack Linus. This isn't one of them, great video with an even-handed realistic take.
Kestrel (Falcon NW Tiki) – 3.7 GHz i9 10900K / 32GB RAM / 2x2TB Intel 7600p (RAID0), 2x480GB Intel 730 (RAID0), 10TB STX BarraCuda Pro / TITAN V 12GB
Iridium (MacBook Pro Mid-2012) – 2.7 GHz i7 3820QM / 16GB RAM / 4TB Samsung 860 Pro / GeForce GT 650M 1GB

Eric5h5:
When there's a multiplayer version, I'm going to be on Frost's team. Well, except he doesn't seem to actually need a team...I mean, what's the point? "Hey look, it's Frost and His Merry Gang of Useless Hangers-On!" Or something.

#105 Sneaky Snake

Sneaky Snake

    Official Mascot of the 1988 Winter Olympics

  • IMG Writers
  • 3434 posts
  • Steam Name:SneakySnake
  • Steam ID:sneaky_snake
  • Location:Waterloo, Canada

Posted 29 June 2020 - 07:32 PM

Looks like someone broke NDA and there is benchmarks out of the A12Z running Geekbench (via Rosetta 2) in macOS 11.

https://www.macrumor...h&utm_campaign=

Note:
  • The Geekbench runs are done using Rosetta 2, since Geekbench in macOS is not available natively for ARM
  • The A12Z, running emulated Geekbench, outperforms the Surface Pro X, which was running a native version of Geekbench (no emulation)
  • Rosetta 2 seems to be around a 30% performance hit vs native (If you compare the macOS A12Z score with the iPad A12Z score)
  • The A12Z chip is almost certainly slower then anything that will actually be in a 'real' Mac that ships this fall (will probably have an A13X or A14X)

2019 16" MBP: i7 9750H @ 2.6 GHz || Radeon 5500M 4GB || 16 GB DDR4 || 512 GB SSD || macOS Catalina
Desktop PC: R5 3600X || GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 || 16 GB DDR4 || 960 Evo NVMe + 1TB Seagate FireCuda || Win10 Pro
Other: 30TB Plex Server || PS4 Pro || iPhone X

#106 Thain Esh Kelch

Thain Esh Kelch

    Admin

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4395 posts
  • Steam ID:thaineshkelch
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 30 June 2020 - 12:53 AM

Snatched from an Ars Technica discussion on the subject:

Quote

In an interview with John Gruber, Craig Federighi said this is meant as a devkit only and will not be replicated for the actual ARM based Macs and they'll run custom silicon. He also said something along the lines of "its not bad performance for a dev kit" and, quote, "This is without our silicon team even trying".

Can these scores have been run using Geekbench from iOS on Big Sur, and thus with native ARM support?
"They're everywhere!" -BOB

#107 jeannot

jeannot

    Taunting a Second Time

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 426 posts

Posted 30 June 2020 - 04:20 AM

Quote

  • The Geekbench runs are done using Rosetta 2, since Geekbench in macOS is not available natively for ARM
But the iOS version is, and should be able to run natively on the dev kit.
EDIT: ok, it cannot yet be installed because it is only available on the iOS App Store.

#108 nick68k

nick68k

    Legendary

  • IMG Writers
  • 507 posts
  • Location:Not here. But close.

Posted 29 July 2020 - 05:51 AM

Jason Snell over at SixColors wrote an interesting piece speculating about the sort of performance we might expect from Apple's ARM Macs.
You must gather your party before venturing forth.

#109 Thain Esh Kelch

Thain Esh Kelch

    Admin

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4395 posts
  • Steam ID:thaineshkelch
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 29 July 2020 - 06:04 AM

So much speculation. I've told my girlfriend to hold off on all Mac/iPad shopping until we see an ARM Mac in the field, but even though I expect Apple to do good, I don't expect them to send the Mac into a whole new level of processing speed.
"They're everywhere!" -BOB

#110 Sneaky Snake

Sneaky Snake

    Official Mascot of the 1988 Winter Olympics

  • IMG Writers
  • 3434 posts
  • Steam Name:SneakySnake
  • Steam ID:sneaky_snake
  • Location:Waterloo, Canada

Posted 29 July 2020 - 08:22 AM

I find it hard to believe that the rumored M14 chip has a geekbench multicore core score 2000 points higher then the 12c/24t Ryzen 3900X, but I would love to be wrong.
2019 16" MBP: i7 9750H @ 2.6 GHz || Radeon 5500M 4GB || 16 GB DDR4 || 512 GB SSD || macOS Catalina
Desktop PC: R5 3600X || GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 || 16 GB DDR4 || 960 Evo NVMe + 1TB Seagate FireCuda || Win10 Pro
Other: 30TB Plex Server || PS4 Pro || iPhone X

#111 nick68k

nick68k

    Legendary

  • IMG Writers
  • 507 posts
  • Location:Not here. But close.

Posted 29 July 2020 - 09:05 AM

I agree, it's all to be taken with a very large pinch of salt. But Snell is a cautious- and seasoned Apple watcher, so who knows.
You must gather your party before venturing forth.

#112 Thain Esh Kelch

Thain Esh Kelch

    Admin

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4395 posts
  • Steam ID:thaineshkelch
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 30 July 2020 - 05:13 AM

View PostSneaky Snake, on 29 July 2020 - 08:22 AM, said:

I find it hard to believe that the rumored M14 chip has a geekbench multicore core score 2000 points higher then the 12c/24t Ryzen 3900X, but I would love to be wrong.
Well, the ARM platform is very scaleable, so Apple could in principle build an extreme multicore machine if they wanted to, that would blow away any Ryzen chip. And a lot of their pro software is written to fully support multiple cores, so it may be they introduce an extreme variant of the Mac Pro. But for all other machines, they likely won't go above 10-12 performance cores.
"They're everywhere!" -BOB

#113 Camper-Hunter

Camper-Hunter

    Wabbit Swayer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 520 posts
  • Steam Name:Camper-Hunter
  • Steam ID:Rorqual
  • Location:Paris, France

Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:16 AM

Synthetic benchmarks are one thing, real-world performance is another. Nowadays I only care about the latter. When the PowerPC debuted (or the 2nd gen, PPC 603/604, I don't remember), the BYTEmark benchmark was heavily used to show how faster the PPC was compared to Pentiums of the era (do you remember the snail ad?). But in real world use, the advantage wasn't so clear cut, it depends on apps, the way they're programmed and what they use and do, and Pentiums were still faster for some tasks and apps. So, wait and see!

#114 jos

jos

    Forum Member of the Month

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 145 posts

Posted 14 September 2020 - 11:16 AM

https://nvidianews.n...r-the-age-of-ai

So, what does this mean for Apple? As we all know Apple has only been using GPUs from Intel and AMD for the last few years as they completely abandoned NVIDIA several years ago. Just a few months ago Apple announced they'd make a transition from Intel CPUs to ARM CPUs and now NVIDIA's suddenly acquiring ARM.

So, what does this mean? Of course Apple won't be too eager to partner up with NVIDIA again, but suddenly that's what they have to do. However, this time not for GPUs, but for CPUs. What does this mean for graphics? ARM has GPU cores embedded in them, so will future ARM chips have NVIDIA GPU cores embedded in them? What does this mean for Apple's relationship with AMD when NVIDIA's pushing their GPU cores down Apple's throat?

Sorry if I'm talking just complete nonsense. I just read this news a few moments ago and I just wrote down my own thoughts, even though I don't have much knowledge on this particular matter. Those with actual knowledge about these kind of things, please correct me and write down your thoughts, as the above text is nothing more than the thoughts of someone who has no idea what he's talking about.

#115 ozzy

ozzy

    Who?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 487 posts
  • Steam Name:ozzy
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 14 September 2020 - 01:19 PM

It's a good question. I thought that Apple licensed the ARM instruction set from ARM, but produced all of their chipsets themselves and have for the last 6-8 years (so they haven't relied on ARM chips for 6-8 years or so, just licensing the technology). My guess is there will be some sort of conditions in the sale for it to pass anti-monopoly regulators requiring Nvidia to still license the instruction set or something like that?

Put another way, I wouldn't expect it to change too much about the Apple/NVidia relationship one way or the other.

But this is all just a guess on my part.

#116 Tetsuya

Tetsuya

    Master Blaster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2255 posts
  • Location:MI

Posted 14 September 2020 - 02:08 PM

From everything ive seen, ARM is still operating independently, and is still committed to their Open-source approach, at least from the press release i read.

It wont really affect Apple unless they get into a snit simply because nVidia now owns ARM.

Like, Steve would have probably been irate as all get out because of it, simply because of his (irrational) hate-on for nVidia.  Whether Tim will be the same, who knows.  But i doubt it.