Posted 27 October 2016 - 07:19 PM
Posted 28 October 2016 - 02:40 PM
I stopped watching those a long time ago. I'm already so damn cynical, I don't need that channel ruining every movie for me.
Posted 29 October 2016 - 10:48 AM
i.e will it just be a little buggy or will it refuse to run or even worse panic the machine?
I'm particularly interest in reports from any other Radeon 7950 owners?
Feral seems to black list nearly all AMD chips and Steam says R9 290 or GTX680 minimum - I assume the first must refer to the mobility version from the 5K iMac (?) which looks similar in specs to the 7950 Mac Edition and with a GTX680 even the desktop one is only maybe 15 to 20% more powerful.
Only recently realised my 7950 was unsupported in anything when firing up COH2 and that at least just gives an error on launch. It seemed to run just fine in Sierra as far as I can tell.
Mad Max is on sale this weekend so any feedback is appreciated.
I have been half thinking about it but it seems a little over the top to buy a GTX 680 and sell this card on for just a couple of games.
Plug an play with a boot screen is important for me as I don't have Windows and need hassle free software updates which limits my options.
Posted 29 October 2016 - 12:16 PM
Posted 29 October 2016 - 02:40 PM
Thanks - I'm aware the GTX680 was available in a Mac version (2GB) with EFI, and even 4GB PC cards can be flashed for a boot screen.
The reasons I went with the 7950 at the time a few years back was that there was a fair price difference and some bugs in the NVIDIA drivers - Apple had gone AMD across the range and generally I'd had good experiences before. It has been a good card with the exception of some random flickering/flashing doing simple stuff like web browsing.
I know some folks are running GTX970, 980 etc. using web drivers only with standard PC Cards or a few with custom EFI mods to these but I prefer it to just work with OS updates (my an early adopter) and without swapping out any hardware, plus there is a large price premium - makes a Mac EFI modded card far more than I ever paid for a GPU.
I'm not sure the GTX680 is enough of a step forward to justify it as an upgrade now but it may have to be on compatibility grounds if this is likely to be the case with more new titles going forward and I end up running this machine a few more years.
That is now looking quite likely for me as it seems Apple are continuing their move away from desktops in general - I guess there is a chance for the iMac to meet my needs with the next update but I don't expect any miracles with the GPU i.e a mobility chip for low TDP and thin..., and then there is cost.
It was bad enough looking at paying as much for an non-upgradable machine as I paid for my Mac Pro back in 2009 as it meant total cost of ownership was going to be far higher - no way I could expect the same lifespan from an all in one either. Now with the exchange rate there have been substantial price rises over here as well - a lot down to speculators more than politics in reality but it's likely to take while to go the other way as Apple rarely change pricing points.
Posted 30 October 2016 - 04:24 AM
Posted 30 October 2016 - 09:57 AM
mattw, if you don't want the hassle of non boot screen cards, I'd recommend getting a used PC 680 and flash it yourself. Because paying $250 for a used preflashed 680 is way too expensive for a four years old card, which you can find used for $100. Warning though: if the only card you have is the 7950, you're in trouble for flashing the 680, because the latter won't power up without two power cable connected, the Mac only has two, and the 7950 needs one or two also. So either you also have a small Mac card which doesn't need external power, or you can borrow a PC tower for an hour.
Posted 30 October 2016 - 10:13 AM
Posted 30 October 2016 - 04:06 PM
I was sure they were going to frak up Mad Max like every reboot fraks up everything these days (with a few notable exceptions like BSG where the reboot ends up even better than the source material). I went to the movie anyway with my dad. We both loved the popsnizzle out of it.
Fitting that the game, then, also bucks the trend of movie tie-in games being terrible by being super awesome.
Iridium (MacBook Pro Mid-2012) – 2.7 GHz i7 3820QM / 16GB RAM / 4TB Samsung 860 Pro / GeForce GT 650M 1GB
Antimony (PowerBook G4 2001) – 1.0 GHz PPC 7455 / 1GB RAM / 512GB Micron M600 / Radeon 9000 64MB
When there's a multiplayer version, I'm going to be on Frost's team. Well, except he doesn't seem to actually need a team...I mean, what's the point? "Hey look, it's Frost and His Merry Gang of Useless Hangers-On!" Or something.
Posted 31 October 2016 - 01:58 AM
"We do what we must, because we can."
"Gaming on a Mac is like women on the internet." — "Highly common and totally awesome?"
Posted 31 October 2016 - 08:26 AM
And I agree with frost, that amazingly a game spinoff was good for once.
Posted 23 December 2016 - 09:07 AM
Despite the warning message about my machine being unsupported it seems however to run just fine on my upgraded 09 Mac Pro with Radeon 7950 on Sierra 10.12.2 so far (played about 70 minutes).
I just set the resolution to 1440p and left the default graphics settings. I don't know what bugs there are supposed to be and will play around turning on some of the extra graphical effects but it was certainly smooth enough and didn't look too bad either.
Posted 24 December 2016 - 05:06 AM
I was pleasantly surprised to not see a message pop up saying my MacBook Pro was unsupported, even though my CPU does not fulfil the minimum requirements.
I'll try the default settings on 1050p, let's see how it runs.
Posted 24 December 2016 - 05:26 AM
After reading a PC tuning guide which said most of the graphical options could be enabled with minimal performance hits even on medium to low end PC I tried turned on the other graphics options except for the two they mentioned do effect performance - SSAO and Landscape Debris.
The game does look a little better now and I can't say the performance is noticeably any worse.
Posted 08 February 2017 - 05:58 PM
13" with Touch Bar, Iris 550 Graphics which misses the official requirements by quite a lot. What can I say, after the obligatory warning, the game runs like a charm! Half native resolution (1280x800) and low (not even lowest) settings, still looks great.
MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2016, 4 TBT3) — 3.1 GHz i5-6287U | Iris 550 | 16 GB RAM | 512 GB Flash | Space Gray
iMac (27-inch, Late 2012) — 3.4 GHz i7-3770 | GTX 680MX | 32 GB RAM | 1 TB Fusion Drive
iMac (Flat Panel) — 700 MHz PPC 7450 (G4) | GeForce2 MX | 640 MB RAM | 40 GB HDD
iMac (5 Flavors) — 333 MHz PPC 750 (G3) | ATI Rage Pro | 512 MB RAM | 6 GB HDD | Tangerine
iPhone X — 256 GB | Silver
iPhone 5s — 32 GB | Space Gray
iPad Pro (10.5-inch) — 256 GB | Space Gray
iPad Air 2 — 64 GB | Space Gray
iPad — 16 GB
iPod touch (3rd generation) — 32 GB
iPod touch — 8 GB
Apple Watch (1st generation) — 42 mm | Stainless Steel (Yes, there's games for watchOS)
Posted 16 March 2018 - 10:21 PM
So, I take it my GTX 775M 2mb isn't supported?
(Then) 2005 Powermac G5 Dual Core 2.3 ghz, Leopard, 256mb nvidia 6600GT.
(Archived) DA w/Single Sonnet G4 1.4 ghz 2mb L3, Tiger, 1 gb ram, 128 mb ati 9800 pro (AGP)
Posted 17 March 2018 - 02:09 AM
You have a 700 series card from 2013, which is supported, unlike the 7xxx series from 2006/07 which is not.
I played Mad Max with a 750M with 2GB, so you should be fine.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: mad max, mad, max, feral, wb, Magnum Opus
Gaming on Mac →
Mac Strategy →
Gaming on Mac →
Mac Strategy →
Gaming on Mac →
Mac Adventure, RPG & MMOs →
Gaming on Mac →
Gaming on Mac →
Mac Action & Shooters →